Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 2:36:25 GMT -5
The red herring because that particular implementation of a nonneutral situation is not that bad. Its not particularly bad for consumers. Its not particularly bad for businesses. If TMobile just charged their normal rate and then they happen to have this Oh by the way here you get this little portion of the web for free no ones going to complain about that. Its not particularly terrible. But it does violate net neutrality and it is a very slippery slope to a world like this a very painful world for a lot of people.
Thats why were willing to sort of take the sacrifices of saying Kazakhstan Phone Number we dont want to allow this because it violates the principle and the law of net neutrality. Payoffs required for access or speed Then the third thing that would almost certainly happen is that there would be payoffs. . You have to pay more as a consumer to your ISP in order to access the web in the way that you do today and as a website in order to reach consumers who maybe cant afford or choose not to pay more you have to pay off the ISP to get that full access. Whats the risk Why am I bringing this up now Higher than ever... Why is the risk so high Well it turns out the new American administration has basically come out against net neutrality in a very aggressive fashion.
The new FCC Chair Ajit Pai has been fighting this pretty hard. Hes made a bunch of statements just in the last few days. He actually overturned some rulings from years past that asked smaller ISPs to be transparent about their net neutrality practices and thats been overturned. Hes arguing this basically under what Im going to call a guise of free markets and competitive marketplaces. I think that is a total misnomer. This creates a truly equal marketplace for everyone.
Thats why were willing to sort of take the sacrifices of saying Kazakhstan Phone Number we dont want to allow this because it violates the principle and the law of net neutrality. Payoffs required for access or speed Then the third thing that would almost certainly happen is that there would be payoffs. . You have to pay more as a consumer to your ISP in order to access the web in the way that you do today and as a website in order to reach consumers who maybe cant afford or choose not to pay more you have to pay off the ISP to get that full access. Whats the risk Why am I bringing this up now Higher than ever... Why is the risk so high Well it turns out the new American administration has basically come out against net neutrality in a very aggressive fashion.
The new FCC Chair Ajit Pai has been fighting this pretty hard. Hes made a bunch of statements just in the last few days. He actually overturned some rulings from years past that asked smaller ISPs to be transparent about their net neutrality practices and thats been overturned. Hes arguing this basically under what Im going to call a guise of free markets and competitive marketplaces. I think that is a total misnomer. This creates a truly equal marketplace for everyone.